Smokin'

At Ruddy & Dean, a Staten Island hangout near a courthouse that's popular with district attorneys, lawyers and judges, bar business has been slashed by half.
"If it weren't for private parties, I'd shut down," said owner Danny Mills. Business at Bill's Gay '90s in Midtown is off 50 percent overall. "If this keeps up, some of us might as well just close up shop," manager Richie Sporacchio complained.
What you can do in Austin, Texas
Show up at City Council mettings and express your views on the smoking ordinance, which is a "sleeper" issue that may sneak though without much citizen input unless you show up. More details later on exactly where to go this evening to express your views. At present this page is a work in progress which will include input from concerned citizens as they are sent to us via email at smoke@austinmayor.com , keep in mind that we'll be publishing these on this web page.
You can also post your views directly on the Spring, an Austin discussion forum website.
The debate and votes on the smoking ordinance will probably be this Thursday at 1:30 pm.
Austinmayor.com is making it easy for you to express your views to the city council. Send an email to council@austinmayor.com and it will be forwarded to all the members of the City Council.
As far as we can tell, Gus Garcia, Danny Thomas, Darryl Slusher and Raoul Alvarez are the Council members who will probably vote for the ordinance.
Will Wynn, Jackie Goodman and Betty Dunkerly are probably voting against the new ordinance.
That's the line up. Darryl Slusher may be the swing vote if he decides to vote no or to abstain (more likely).

Smoking Ordinance in the News:
Naked
City
Austin Chronicle, TX - Apr
17, 2003
... Mayor Kirk Watson, and a dissatisfied Austin
... on legislation to authorize a Central
Texas ... big meeting -- featuring more debate of the smoking
ordinance ...
Austin
at Large: Smoke and Mirrors
Austin Chronicle, TX - Apr
10, 2003
... is a middle ground -- the existing smoking ordinance
... El Paso, all now with stricter
smoking ... Free Coalition is embarrassed that Austin
does not lead Texas ...
Naked
City
Austin Chronicle, TX - Apr
10, 2003
... Texas is more like Popeye's skinny
girlfriend ... for corporations, small business needs
and keeping Austin ... but no action) on the draft smoking
ordinance ...
CITY
COUNCIL: Meeting to address ban on smoking
The Daily Texan, TX - Apr
10, 2003
... The Smokers Fighting Discrimination group, based in
Katy, Texas ... Council passed 10-3
an ordinance banning smoking in ... The proposed ordinance
for Austin ...
Dallas
mayoral candidates get down to business
Dallas Business Journal, TX - Apr
22, 2003
... leaders to help pass legislation in Austin ...
I voted against the anti-smoking ordinance ... SAENZ:
I do not believe the smoking ... the economic center of North Texas
...
Smoking Ordinance Now |
Here are some key points of Austin's current smoking ordinance as
it applies to bars and restaurants:
|
Smoking Ordinance Proposed - A new, tougher smoking ordinance is proposed and is supported by an organization called Smoke-Free Austin Coalition, the details on the ordinance are on their web site.
Smoke-Free
Austin Coalition
SMOKING BAN ORDINANCE, AUSTIN, TEXAS
Resources Activated • PM and
RJR Smokers Call City Council Members Prior to the Hearing and Testify at the ...
http://www.smokefreeaustin.org
Why is a 100% smoke-free ordinance a good idea?
| Secondhand smoke causes health problems just like active smoking. | |||||||
Secondhand smoke is linked to cancer, heart
disease and respiratory illness in non-smoking adults, and it is especially
harmful to children.
| Secondhand smoke creates a serious occupational
health hazard for hospitality workers, especially bar workers who suffer a
50 percent higher rate of lung cancer than the average office worker.
| Many people unwillingly are exposed to secondhand
smoke while working or spending time in public venues.
| Everyone has a right to breathe clean indoor air! | |
http://smokefreeaustin.org links
![]()
Citizen Response
| MIKE CLARK-MADISON of the Austin Chronicle |
April 11, 2003:
Let me confess that I've been a smoker for most of my adult life. (People are surprised by this, just as they're surprised that I follow sports and go to church.) I am suitably ashamed -- the proper attitude with which to approach Austin's proposed smoking ban, up for public hearing (but not a vote) at the City Council tonight. I think it's a dumb idea, a stance many will expect from a lowly and despicable tobacco addict. Even if I were (still) a proud ex-smoker, I'd think this was a dumb idea. But I also think it's a done deal. The times are propitious for ban proponents, flush from their success in newly smoke-free New York City, and the Tobacco-Free Austin Coalition is pouring it on to get Austin's 1994 Smoking in Public Places Ordinance (the "SIPPO") tightened up to create a "100% Smoke-Free Austin." They even have yard signs, and they'll be out in numbers at the council tonight. As, no doubt, will be the club owners and potentates of the Live Music Capital, who surmise -- accurately -- that the proposed ordinance is specifically targeted at bars. There is no middle ground here; if you support a tougher SIPPO, you're a Nazi, and if you oppose it, you're a barbarian who doesn't care if people die. Actually, there is a middle ground -- the existing smoking ordinance, which in my humble opinion has done a pretty good job of making Austin the Clean Air City that the guy on the airport voice-over talks about with such pride. You have to break a sweat in Austin to find a public place where you can smoke, as we notice when in other locales with looser laws. I was recently in a diner outside Tampa that even at 8am looked and smelled like the Continental Club at last call, and I'm quite glad this is not allowed under current law in Austin. Proponents of a complete ban decry the SIPPO's 18 exemptions, as if a double-digit number proves it's a worthless sieve of a law. But most of those exemptions are different ways of saying "bar" -- other than drinking houses, you'll encounter secondhand smoke in Austin in bingo parlors and bowling alleys, neither of which are thick on the ground here. (And, of course, in the state Capitol.) The most obvious loophole in the SIPPO -- for restaurants with less than 50 seats -- is almost never used; the only restaurant I can think of where nonsmokers have to suck up exhaust is the Star Seeds Cafe. That is, if there are any nonsmokers at Star Seeds. I can't verify this fact. |
![]()
Monique "Mee" Davila, Sam and Bob listener
I sent this to the council this morning and heard you on KVET and thought I share. I didn't want to over bore them with detail, just my simple opinion.
I am for this ordinance, having asthma and an over sensitive nose I look forward to the day I can go to a pool hall or bowling alley and be able to breath and not be medicated the next day.
People keep saying there will be a loss of business, maybe, in the beginning. But as with all change Austinites will get tired of being home and be out in enjoying Austin. And maybe all those non-smokers who hated being around the smokers will take their places when smokers boycott public places. I know I be glad to be out in public without the smoke. Remember the restaurant smoking ordinance, that did not stop people from eating and if you look around there are many more restaurants in Austin.
I just pray that the Austin City Council will vote for the smoking ordinance and realize people have always been skeptics to change.
Since this effects people's health, think of all the positive rewards, think of the money saved public assistant health care.
Thank you for your time.
V. Monique Davila
![]()
Carl Speed, Sam and Bob listener
I don't live in Austin, so I can't vote in Austin. Consequently, my opinion doesn't mean much to the people who aren't concerned with whether I will support them, since they already know they can't count on my vote. Which really stinks because I spend most of my waking life in Austin each day, so I'm more affected by what they do here than by what the city fathers of Dripping Springs do.
1. I am not a smoker.
2. I have never been a smoker.
3. I would prefer to be where there isn't smoke. I expect a smoke-free office, but entertainment--eating/drinking/dancing--is a different story.
4. I believe the world would be much safer if people didn't smoke, but that's the choice of those who smoke.
5. I believe the private property rights of the people who own restaurants and bars take precedence over all of the above.
6. I believe freedom of choice and competition in a free market economy should be the determining factors in whether a proprietor decides to allow or prohibit smoking in his place of business.
If I'm with friends who want to smoke and a restaurant doesn't allow it, we'll go elsewhere. If I want a smoke-free meal and the restaurant can't keep the smoke out of my face, I'll go elsewhere. Ultimately, the owner of the business has to be accountable to his customers and potential customers or he'll go out of business. The risk is entirely his to bear; the government doesn't stand to lose any investment. Unless the government wants to ensure businesses against lost revenue when they can't even balance their own budget, they need to stick to doing those things we need government for and let businesses do what they already know how to do.
If I had a say in the matter, I'd vote against the smoking ordinance. On the other hand, it might be preferable for them to pass it so that the affected businesses would have a cause of action for a class action suit against the city. It would be more expensive, but in the long run, if they prevailed (I'm assuming they'd have to get at least as far as the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals), it might prevent more such infringements on private property rights in the future.
Carl Speed
Dripping Springs
![]()
Beerland sez:
Friends of Beerland,
Right now, the Austin
City Council is considering an out and out ban on smoking
in all public places, including bars, restaurants, live music venues, coffee
shops, and even bingo halls and bus stops.
Patios and most places currently considered "smoking
areas" will not be exempt. (The outside of Emo's and Casino el Camino will
be non-smoking. The
patios at Sacred Cup Coffeehouse and Spiderhouse--hell, every public patio--will
be non-smoking.) Beerland,
Room 710, Flamingo Cantina, Emo's, Casino el Camino, Little City, The Parlor, La
Cucaracha, Sacred Cup, Red-Eyed Fly, Elysium, Stubb's, and many more of your
favorite local businesses will be completely non-smoking.
You will not even be able to smoke outside the clubs either, not within
twenty-five feet. That means no one can smoke anywhere on Sixth Street or Red
River.
You might know about similar smoking
ordinances in other parts of the country, like Dallas and California and New
York. Most of these ordinances have special allowances for bars. Austin's
will not. Austin's
proposed ordinance is
based on the Helena, Montana ordinance
which was repealed as unconstitutional six months after it passed. But please
don't think your favorite hang-outs can last six months with even fewer
customers during an already depressed economy. Twenty-five percent of bars went
out of business shortly after the smoking
ordinance was passed
in Tempe, Arizona, a city demographically similar to Austin.
Even if you don't smoke, look around you next time you're out. Most people in
bars do smoke. While only 20% of Austinites smoke, it is estimated that 50-90%
of clubgoers smoke. If they can't smoke in bars, they'll simply quit coming.
Acoustic Cafe was a non-smoking
bar on Sixth Street. You probably don't remember it because it didn't last long.
Bars and live music venues depend on the business of people who happen to smoke.
Look again, musicians tend to also be smokers. Without smokers, live music
venues don't stand a chance.
Please take the time to tell Mayor Gus Garcia and the members of the City Coucil
to not change the smoking ordinance
we already have. Check out keepaustinfree.com
for more information and a form letter you can send. Or write your own. Or call
their offices. Do something.
Thanks for your valuable time and priceless help,
Randall Stockton

Mayor Gus Garcia
Phone: (512) 974-2250
Gus.Garcia@ci.austin.tx.us
P. O. Box 1088
Austin, Texas
78767
Mayor Pro Tem Jackie Goodman
Phone: (512) 974-2255
Jackie.Goodman@ci.austin.tx.us
P. O. Box 1088
Austin, Texas
78767
Raul Alvarez
Council Member Place 2
Raul.Alvarez@ci.austin.tx.us
Phone: (512) 974-2264
P. O. Box 1088
Austin, Texas
78767
Betty Dunkerley
Council Member Place 4
Betty.Dunkerley@ci.austin.tx.us
Phone: (512) 974-2258
P. O. Box 1088
Austin, Texas
78767
Daryl Slusher
Council Member Place 1
Daryl.Slusher@ci.austin.tx.us
Phone: (512) 974-2260
P. O. Box 1088
Austin, Texas
78767
Danny Thomas
Council Member Place 6
Danny.Thomas@ci.austin.tx.us
Phone: (512) 974-2266
P. O. Box 1088
Austin, Texas
78767
Will Wynn
Council Member Place 5
Will.Wynn@ci.austin.tx.us
Phone: (512) 974-2256
P. O. Box 1088
Austin, Texas
78767
![]()
Keep Austin Free organization:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()